Use My Track vs SubmitHub, Playlist Push, and Feature.fm: How to Choose a Music Promotion Service
An honest side-by-side of four music promotion services: mechanics, entry price, what you actually pay for, and what none of them can guarantee.
Artists promoting music on Spotify usually choose between three types of tools: pitching curators, ad platforms, and direct-promotion services powered by real listeners. Each approach has its own mechanics, guarantees, and limitations — and what works for one artist may be useless for another.
Below is an honest comparison of Use My Track with three of the best-known players in the market: SubmitHub, Playlist Push, and Feature.fm.
Quick Overview: The Difference Between Approaches
| Use My Track | SubmitHub | Playlist Push | Feature.fm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanics | Direct activity from real listeners: streams, likes, saves, pre-saves, video posting | Paid pitching of the track to playlist and blog curators | Automated paid pitching to curators | Paid ads on partner platforms + marketing tools |
| What you're paying for | A guaranteed volume of activity | A curator reviewing and giving feedback | Curator review, not placement | Ad impressions and access to tools |
| Result guarantee | The package is fully delivered | No — placement is at the curator's discretion | No — the platform openly states it can't guarantee placement | No — depends on ad response |
| Entry price | From $19 | From ~$1 per credit | From $285 per campaign | Freemium + ad budget |
| Market focus | Spotify, with a focus on Latin America | Global | Global (Spotify) | Global |
Mechanics, entry price, and guarantees — no marketing spin
SubmitHub: Pitching Curators Through Credits
SubmitHub is one of the oldest and best-known platforms for pitching music to playlist curators, music blogs, radio stations, and influencers. Artists buy "credits" — free standard credits or premium ones (from ~$1) — and send them to curators, each of whom requests 1–3 credits to review a track.
Curators must respond within 48–72 hours and give at least 10–20 words of feedback if they reject the track. But here's the key point: you're paying for the track to be reviewed, not for it to be added to a playlist. Approval rates, by various estimates, range from 5% (standard submissions) to 18% (premium). The platform claims a database of around 28,000 curators, but independent estimates suggest only 4,000–6,000 are consistently active.
What this means for you: SubmitHub is a good fit if you're comfortable with a high rejection rate and value curator feedback as a standalone benefit — even without placement. But actual streaming results are entirely unguaranteed, and a budget spread across 30 curators can run $30–90 without a single guaranteed stream.
Playlist Push: Automated Pitching at a Higher Price Point
Playlist Push works on a similar model but is more automated and priced differently. Campaigns start at $285; the platform automatically matches your track with 20+ genre-appropriate curators from a network of 1,490+ and sends the pitch without manual searching. Curators are paid for a review — from $1.50 to $15, depending on their audience size.
Playlist Push states directly and openly on its site: they cannot pay for placement — that would violate Spotify's rules — and they offer an Artist Protection Fund, refunding you if a curator doesn't provide a quality review. Independent reviews put approval rates in the 30–60% range, but feedback is mixed: some artists note that they're effectively paying for "review," not a guaranteed outcome, and returns relative to spend can be modest.
What this means for you: Playlist Push is a solid option for artists with a budget of $500+ and a well-produced track who don't have time for manual pitching. But at a $285 entry point, the starting cost is notably higher than most alternatives, and there's still no placement guarantee.
Feature.fm: Ads and Marketing Tools, Not Pitching
Feature.fm isn't a curator-pitching service — it's a marketing toolkit: smart links, pre-save pages, paid audio ads for the track, and fan email collection with retargeting.
An important nuance that's often missed: Feature.fm's ads don't run inside Spotify itself. That's a closed ecosystem, and only Spotify sells access to it through its own Ad Studio. Feature.fm's ads play on partner platforms — Deezer, Audiomack, 8tracks, and a network of music websites — and traffic from there may lead to Spotify via a smart link. The monetization model is a tools subscription plus a separate ad budget.
What this means for you: Feature.fm is useful if you need CRM infrastructure for your fanbase and are willing to run a separate ad campaign. But it's a fundamentally different tool — not an alternative to direct promotion, but more of a complement to it.
Use My Track: Direct Activity From Real Listeners
Use My Track is built differently from all three services above. Instead of pitching curators or buying ad impressions, you get a guaranteed volume of activity from real service users: full streams, likes, pre-saves, playlist adds on Spotify, plus a separate service — video mass-posting under your track on TikTok, Reels, and Shorts by real creators.
The key difference from pitching platforms: there's no gatekeeper whose personal decision determines whether your audience sees the track. The promotion package is delivered in full — it's not a submission for review, but a guaranteed volume of real human activity.
Compared to SubmitHub and Playlist Push, Use My Track offers: - A lower entry point — from $19 vs. $285 for Playlist Push; - No curator rejection risk — activity is delivered as ordered, not decided by one person's taste; - A focus on the Latin American audience — listener targeting accounts for language and regional preferences rather than a generic global pool; - Built-in video mass-posting — as a standalone service, not a side feature.
In the interest of fairness: it's worth understanding a real difference in how each service approaches platform compliance. SubmitHub and Playlist Push deliberately avoid a "pay for streams" model, since Spotify's rules take a cautious view of that kind of incentivized activity. Use My Track operates on a different principle — the activity is carried out by real people, not automated scripts or bots — but the underlying mechanic of paying directly for actions is closer to what platforms monitor than a "pay for a curator's review" model is. We believe this trade-off is justified: real people, real listening, and genuine interest in the music — unlike bot farms, which leave easily detectable technical traces.
Which One Should You Choose
SubmitHub — if pitching specific curators, blogs, and radio matters to you, you can tolerate a high rejection rate, and you value written feedback as a benefit in its own right.
Playlist Push — if you have a $500+ budget, a well-produced track, and want automated pitching without manual curator research.
Feature.fm — if you need tools for building a fanbase and retargeting, and you're ready to run a separate ad campaign on partner platforms.
Use My Track — if you need a guaranteed volume of real activity without the risk of curator rejection, especially if you're promoting on Spotify in Latin America and want to boost your track further with video content on social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is Use My Track different from pitching platforms like SubmitHub?
On pitching platforms, you pay for a curator to look at the track and possibly decide to add it — the outcome isn't guaranteed. With Use My Track, you get a guaranteed volume of activity from real service users, with no gatekeeper whose personal opinion decides the track's fate.
Does Use My Track use bots?
No. Activity is carried out by real service users — the same is true for the other services covered here, since bots are easily detected by platforms and lead to metrics being wiped.
Can I combine several services?
Yes, many artists use different tools for different jobs: for example, Feature.fm for building a fanbase and running ads, and Use My Track for a direct boost in streams and activity at release.
Does Use My Track guarantee playlist placement or chart entry?
We guarantee delivery of the activity package (streams, likes, pre-saves, etc.). This creates positive signals for recommendation algorithms, but — like any service in this market — we can't guarantee a specific algorithmic decision or a spot on a particular playlist.
Who is this service designed for?
Primarily independent artists promoting music on Spotify in Latin America, but the packages work for any genre and career stage — from a debut single to a full album.